Category talk:Canadian politicians

	Biography portal This category is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This category is supported by the politics and government work group.

Canada: Governments

	Canada portal This category is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related
	This category is supported by WikiProject Governments of Canada.

Politics

This category is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics

Untitled

Is this just for current politicians or past politicians as well? Federal, provincial, municipal? Do school board trustees get on this list as well? -- Matty j 06:23, Jun 19, 2004 (UTC)

There should be far fewer people listed on this page, many of them can easily be moved to sub-categories. - SimonP 22:24, Aug 21, 2004 (UTC)

I agree, I have started a "Members of the Canadian House of Commons" sub-category and I am starting to move all the MPs to this category. --YUL89YYZ 17:19, Sep 9, 2004 (UTC)

Objective representation of CDN political spectrum

Shouldn't there be broad sub-categories representing e.g. the left political parties and groups in Canada? (I understand, without asking, that bourgeois parties are represented de facto status quo already -- without being identified as such.)

I don't change this page myself, because Wikipedia clearly still has a general "Western" status quo bias (intentional or not), and first I'd like to know if the political hegemony which is poltics in Canada, also has an ideological lock on this section of Wikipedia. In other words: would such classifications be a problem for some possible vested interests?

Just asking.