Talk:Toronto—Danforth (federal electoral district)

This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Elections and Referendums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Canada: Ontario / Toronto / Electoral districts Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ontario portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ontario.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Toronto (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Electoral districts in Canada.

VfD

On April 11, 2005, this article was nominated for deletion. The result was keep, and noted that it should have been discussed on WP:RfD. See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Toronto—Danforth for a record of the discussion. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 16:35, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Initial quality rating

I have given a B rating to this article, because it graphically shows the evolution of the riding and includes some analysis of how its voters vote. I was teetering between 'B' and 'Start'; I think it needs more analytical detail, but a more experienced editor should review and express an opinion. PKT (talk) 16:28, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm older and wiser (kinda) now, and am changing to a "C" rating. PK T(alk) 19:01, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]