Category talk:Rebels

This category is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology

Military history: Biography / Technology

This category is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	Military science, technology, and theory task force

Biography: Military

	Biography portal This category is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This category is supported by the military biography work group.

Untitled

The distinction made in the introduction, in my opinion, is wrong. A revolutionary is a person who is engaged in a political or social revolution, that is the transformation of society by the masses (the people) examples of revolutions are: The French Revolution and the Russian Revolution. A rebel is a person who is engaged in a rebellion that does not entail the changing of society by the masses, but by a part of the masses (e.g. an oppressed minority). To say that a revolutionary is a successful rebel is total nonsense, in my opinion. I think the introduction to this category should be changed.

I just changed it. Feel free to alter it for accuracy. - — Banyan Tree 22:59, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Your definition makes a lot more sense, and I'll stick to that. But, let me please say that my idea isn't complete nonsense... Were Washington, Jefferson, and Adams not rebelling against the English throne? There would have been no revolution had they not been successful. Had the English won, they would have said they had suppressed a rebellion, not a revolution. It may not seem nice, you might not like it, but history is written by the victors, to some extent, and this is reflected in the terminology...

LordAmeth 03:30, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)

First, let me make clear that I did not make the initial comment above. I've always seen revolutionary as a subset of rebel, in that rebels are against authority, while revolutionaries are against authority and want to replace that authority with a completely new system. I have noticed though that there has been a slow motion edit war at rebellion where people remove the American revolutionaries from the list. So your point is well taken. - — Banyan Tree 04:27, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)

I am the one who made the first comments, I did not intend to offend only to emphasis the point. I am very happy with the result, thanks. --130.161.31.18 18:38, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Additions

To add once articles are written: Somatau (or Somadau), Julien Fédon, Anastasio Aquino, Macario Sakay (individual article instead of redirect), Monja Jaona, Pierre Anga, Ruben Um Nyobé, Félix Moumié, Bernard Kolélas, Pierre Mulele, Christophe Gbenye, Gaston Soumialot, Bildad Kaggia, Diamacoune Senghor, John Okello, Nicolau dos Reis Lobato, Chris Soumokil, Johannes Alvarez Manusama, Seth Rumkorem, Thomas Kanza —Sesel 05:27, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]