Talk:Book burning

The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Book burning article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1, 2: 2 years

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook

Freedom of speech Mid‑importance

	Freedom of speech portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Freedom of speech, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Freedom of speech on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Freedom of speechWikipedia:WikiProject Freedom of speechTemplate:WikiProject Freedom of speechFreedom of speech
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

History Mid‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Libraries Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Libraries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Libraries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LibrariesWikipedia:WikiProject LibrariesTemplate:WikiProject LibrariesLibraries
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sociology Mid‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Several new sources

[1] and linked pages. Doug Weller talk 14:10, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tennessee Book Burnings

In Tennessee pastor Greg Locke has held sermons over the incineration of devil and witchcraft worshiping books like Harry Potter and Twilight.[81]

Shouldn't this be phrased in a way as to denote these books are those Locke and/or his followers believe to be 'devil and witchcraft worshiping'? Neither of those examples have anything to do with worshiping either devils or witchcraft. 24.51.192.49 (talk) 10:26, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confusing reference names

I found citation references with names like “:3” and “outrageous.” Changed them to the author names.

Look out for bad reference names hiding in the source.

Added a section on digital censorship with relevant citations. Jellocube27 (talk) 02:15, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Article was mostly trivia

Somehow this article — which concerns organized censorship and destruction of cultural heritage or knowledge — has been completely obfuscated by irrelevant trivia about: authors burning their private letters, neurotic self-sabatoging artists, and poorly-source accounts of religious martyrs. This is not the article topic, and conflates sentimentality with cultural genocide. I plan to remove all such content that does not cite credible sources discussing organized cultural suppression. Jellocube27 (talk) 04:04, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The majority of the trivia I removed, and much of the remaining article, should be moved to List of book-burning incidents. Giant lists of burnings go there, describe Book Burning here. This article should not be huge and untenable, nor become a contest to brag about whose cultures have endured the most “book burnings”… Jellocube27 (talk) 04:10, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I’m not about to overhaul three different articles tonight, as I don’t have enough coffee. But I think that in the future, list transclusion will be the best way to integrate the long lists of burnings (and other things) manageably and meaningfully into the article sections here, if we are to include them at length. Jellocube27 (talk) 04:33, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

For anyone looking for the pre-expurgated version of this article, so that they can migrate information to the list articles, here is the latest revision before I blanked those sections: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Book_burning&oldid=1166427511 Jellocube27 (talk) 04:48, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Qin Shihuang

The section needs to clarify (with appropriate sources natch) that the ancient literature of China was not lost during QSH's purges, even assuming their historicity and attempted thoroughness. The First Emperor burned everyone else's copies of the works but kept his own at Xianyang and/or Epang, which were subsequently burned by Han and Chu during the collapse of the Qin. That was the moment of their actual loss, which is worth noting in the same way that Alexandria needs several caveats. — LlywelynII 12:23, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]