User talk:Maury Markowitz
Hello there, welcome to the 'pedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you need any questions answered about the project then check out Wikipedia:Help or drop me a line. BTW, I like what you have done to the place. Cheers! --maveric149
Nomination of Mailplane (software) for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mailplane (software) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mailplane (software) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk)
DYK nom needs attention
[edit]You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Stellarium
[edit]Your article Stellarium has no sources. Are there any that you used to create the article? Sushidude21! (talk) 02:45, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Sushidude21!: Yeah that is not an article and obviously should not have been created. WP:NOTDICTIONARY. Any experienced editor knows the policies and guidelines saying that stubs should not be created in general, that WP:RS is absolutely mandatory ultimately under pain of blocking. This content should be in another article, but only when cited. Its contents don't even allude to any justification, and the designation of 'stub' is just an admission thereof. — Smuckola(talk) 01:51, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- So should it be deleted/draftified? Sushidude21! (talk) 01:57, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Sushidude21!: As far as I know, yes. Most of this stub's content and the work put into it was to signal that it shouldn't exist, or to say what it is not. I mean that's some commitment! This should have been in a personal sandbox instead of just a needless violation. This user has a many years long history of abandoning huge and totally uncited essays of WP:OR. As an admin, it's his job to block people for doing this. — Smuckola(talk) 02:27, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- So should it be deleted/draftified? Sushidude21! (talk) 01:57, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- It is disappointing just how wrong your 'opinions' here could be. Andy Dingley (talk) 02:55, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Amusing though, no? Maury Markowitz (talk) 03:16, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 6
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Digital Group, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cassette.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
The article Canada Remote Systems has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP: GNG. I could not find any sources to establish notability.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. HyperAccelerated (talk) 01:38, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
CS1 error on Canada Remote Systems
[edit]Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Canada Remote Systems, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:10, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
DYK for Light Weight Air Warning Radar
[edit]On 9 December 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Light Weight Air Warning Radar, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Australian Light Weight Air Warning Radar was once loaded using canoes and later manhandled up a 200 foot cliff? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Light Weight Air Warning Radar. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Light Weight Air Warning Radar), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:03, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
The Signpost: 12 December 2024
[edit]- News and notes: Arbitrator election concludes
- Arbitration report: Palestine-Israel articles 5
- Disinformation report: Sex, power, and money revisited
- Op-ed: On the backrooms by Tamzin
- In the media: Like the BBC, often useful but not impartial
- Traffic report: Something Wicked for almost everybody
Your draft article, Draft:Rolls-Royce CV12
[edit]Hello, Maury Markowitz. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Rolls-Royce CV12".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 01:23, 18 December 2024 (UTC)