User talk:Idont Havaname

This user may have left Wikipedia. Idont Havaname has not edited Wikipedia since June 2015. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Click here to leave me a new message. I'm not as strict about user talk pages as some other editors are, but I do request that you please sign your posts here, including the time stamp, with --~~~~. That way I will know who you are, and it will be easier for me to find your talk page. --Idont Havaname 15:28, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

My old talk page was at User talk:Idont havaname. Sometimes people leave messages there, but please post messages here if you want me to respond; I don't get any notification of new messages when people post messages to the old page. User talk:Idont Havaname and User talk:Idont havaname are different pages, since due to case sensitivity, Idont havaname and Idont Havaname are different users. (I re-registered my old user name, Idont havaname, and then indefinitely blocked it so that nobody could use that account to impersonate me. Idont havaname is now an inactive account.) If you're looking for a message you posted to my old talk page by accident, I might have moved it to User talk:Idont Havaname/Messages to old talk page. --Idont Havaname (Talk) 23:16, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Archives: 001, 002, 003, 004, 005, 006, 007, 008

Your input is requested

Your input would be appreciated at this Request for Comments. Kelly Martin (talk) 18:44, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List of songs that have been considered among the greatest ever

I've nominated it for deletion again. As a previous participant in the debate I thought you'd be interested. Duggy 1138 08:14, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Leyasu

Excuse me, but could you explain to me the precise reason of his/her banning? --Baxtaba 12:34, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Idont Havaname mentions this on Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration#Deltabeignet.

I actually came here to thank you for your comment there, and to clarify some misunderstandings. Since the RfA page is not a discussion page I'm writing this here; please feel free to move this to a more appropriate place if you're aware of one.

There is no "dispute between Deltabeignet and SebastianHelm". Deltabeignet admitted to having disrupted Wikipedia for three months, and all I did was to bring it to the attention of the authorities. Please apply WP:FAITH and don't put me in a pigeon hole. That said, I realize that I probably have been more emotional than what would have been wise when I brought up the case; please understand that I am really frustrated to be reporting what I consider a crime and nobody has acted on it for two days so far.
Leyasu has not been involved in any revert war with me. As to the revertions you cite, these were clearly well intended revertions of perceived vandalism. (It is unfortunately that Leyasu uses adolescent emotional macho language, but I don't see that in itself as a reason for banning him. In the contrary, if you compare [1] with its reversion [2], it is Deltabeignet who wrote the more inappropriate and misleading edit summary.) — Sebastian 18:54, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

On the articles about rapcore, Limp Bizkit and Fred Durst, a certain LUCPOL was much more lucky. Moreover, if Leyasu used "adm language", Lucpol's problem was his broken English (but I finally agreed with him). --Baxtaba 21:22, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Now those questions are over. I've reached some compromises with Lucpol about the positions of the words "nu metal" and "rapcore", and some admins have helped us to correct that articles in order to eschew edit wars. They were only grammar and genre importance problems, but much less dangerous than yours as so as I can see. --Baxtaba 22:48, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Carol Banawa

Thanks so much for helping me through the process. I'm just new here. It's a good thing you helped me. About Carol, I don't think she's planning further releases since she's already in the States.

Thanks again, --Slickdeejay (Talk) 21:36, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Deltabeignet

There is an ongoing discussion on User_talk:Deltabeignet#WP:RFAR.23Deltabeignet, which you may find interesting.

I also have a minor request: Could you please change "dispute between Deltabeignet and SebastianHelm" (in WP:RFAR#Deltabeignet) to something like "this case". You could say I'm grilling him, but this is not a dispute between the two of us, as Deltabeignet confirmed in his statement. Thank you! — Sebastian 06:00, 13 December 2006 (UTC) (I stopped watching this page. If you would like to continue the talk, please do so here and ping me.)[reply]

Category:African American basketball players nominated for CfD

Hello there,

I noticed your note on the category in question. Agreeing with it wholeheartedly, I nominated it for deletion. If you would like to voice your opinion on it, you can go [3] there.--Thomas.macmillan 00:41, 15 December 2006 (UTC)Jaime Navarr[reply]

DYK

On December 19, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Mary Fahl, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

Not a problem at all. I had many such mishaps in the past myself. Thanks for your work. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 07:28, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Deltabeignet

Hello,

An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Deltabeignet. Please add any evidence you may wish the arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Deltabeignet/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Deltabeignet/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, —— Eagle 101 ^{(Need help?)} 13:27, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User:Edipedia

Ah, I switched it to {{indefblockeduser}}. How's that? Khoi khoi 05:01, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Also see what I've made at User:Khoikhoi/Edipedia. :-) Khoi khoi 05:03, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Can you unprotect User:Yepre? I wanted to change the tag from "suspected sockpuppet" to "sockpuppet". Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 17:37, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Christian Metal Project

If you are interested in joining a potential Project Wiki Christian Metal project go here to sign up. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Council/Proposals#Christian_Metal --E tac 08:39, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

project page: Wikipedia:WikiProject Christian Metal --E tac 05:07, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your block of Deathrocker

Deathrocker, who you blocked, has made an {{unblock}} request on his talk page. Please respond to it.Eli Falk 11:52, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Deltabeignet arbitration

Thanks for commenting on some of my Workshop proposals in the case involving Deltabeignet. I appreciated your additions as well.

(FYI, when agreeing with another person's proposal, I think the usual procedure is to put "Endorse" (or, contrarily, "Oppose") before signing. Not that it's worth going back and changing in this case, which looks like it's maybe about to wrap up.)

Regards and Happy New Year. Newyorkbrad 05:16, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Newyorkbrad's RfA

Thank you for your support on my RfA, which closed favorably this morning, as well as for your kind comments accompanying your !vote. I appreciate the confidence the community has placed in me and am looking forward to my new responsibilities. Please let me know if ever you have any comments or suggestions, especially as I am learning how to use the tools. Best regards, Newyorkbrad 18:48, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nominate school for AfD?

Hello, I see you've written an essay on your user page about school notability. I've nominated dozens of articles for AfD, but I try to avoid it if I think it won't succeed. So here's an unclear case: Eastlake Middle School. The content is totally underwhelming, but a school is a school. What do you think? Should I nominate it? (If the answer is yes, you can nominate it yourself. I don't care either way.) YechielMan 02:43, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I checked the list of school deletions that you gave me. Interestingly, the last two months had a preponderance of deletions for middle schools (Ctrl-F for "middle"), but there were a lot of keeps before that. For now, I'll leave it alone. Note that Bonita Vista Middle School is in the same boat as Eastlake. YechielMan 19:17, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

On 23 February, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article ProSlide, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--Yomangani ^talk 23:26, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That information was reported by several local news sources in the Las Vegas area. I have not heard anything differently as of 930 pm tonight.

link add request

dude (or dudette) you may recall me wanting to add links for a web site i'm affiliated with in the wikipedia section for the Chicago Bulls. you denied me at that time, it was a good few months ago.

however if you look at this site you'll notice we're rated the #1 basketball site around:

http://www.top100basketballsites.com/in.php?site=202

i'd appreciate you adding www.ebsports.net to your 'NBA' page here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Basketball_Association

many thanks

gregorius77 (posted at 10pm GMT on 2/4/06)

Disambiguation for Brian Roberts on Ryan Roberts article

This isn't necessary. The names are considerably different. -- KirinX 00:53, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

someone

im not changing anything, and i guess someone else is doing it cuz u said i made changes that were ruining other ppl's work. maybe similar ip? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.234.13.122 (talk) 05:23, 26 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Ice Hockey Project discussion of hockey player notability and project scope

Please come join the WikiProject Ice Hockey Notability standards for hockey players discussion. I'd like to see input from all our project members who have an opinion. Thanks! ColtsScore 01:24, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yo!

Lake Charles Guy here! BeaverWithChainsaw 18:34, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lists should be categories

Since you are an administrator, I thought I would ask you if there is a policy or guideline that states lists should be deleted in favor of categorizing their contents? Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and series boxes, a guideline, seems to state that lists, categories and series boxes are to be used in synergy with eachother. It says nothing about deleting one in favor of the other. Since you advanced this argument at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of rhythm guitarists, and since policy at WP:Deletion#Deletion_discussion states "These processes are not decided through a head count, so participants should explain their opinion and refer to policy", I'm requesting information about the policy or guideline you derived this understanding from. Thank you very much. (Mind meal 03:30, 27 July 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Hi, I have a question

I'm not ready for the commitment of a username. I kind of like being an anonymous contributer. Sometime, I'm sure I'll come around. In the meantime, I want to find out who else has been making edits with my IP. I don't want my IP banned. You warned my IP about some edits to Pat Robertson, Minnesota and some other articles. I would like to see what edits were made. Is there a way to do this? Could you leave a response on the talk page for my IP? Thank you.

-Abe 8/12/07 1:07 pm Central

Amusement park project importance assessment

Hi, I am trying to get some feedback about the importance assessment of articles in the Amusement Park project, here Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Amusement Parks/Assessment. Any thoughts? --Tinned Elk 20:29, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject roller coasters

Hi there, just to let you know that WP:ROCO has been given an overhaul. As you are listed as a participant, I just thought I'd let you know that there's a new to-do section and much clearer guidelines for roller coaster articles. Hope to see you over there! Seaserpent⁸⁵ _Talk 09:46, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Roller Coasters Newsletter, December 2007

Delivered 12th December, 2007 by Seaserpent85. If you would rather not receive this newsletter, please place a * after your username on the members page. Seaserpent⁸⁵ 23:00, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Roller Coasters Newsletter, January 2008

Seaserpent⁸⁵ 14:36, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

On 9 January, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Siam Park, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Wizardman 05:55, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Roller Coasters Newsletter, February 2008

Seaserpent⁸⁵ 20:49, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of ThouShaltNot

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article ThouShaltNot, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Ford MF (talk) 15:59, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timeline of fictional future events

You commented in the last Article for deletion discussion. This article is up for deletion again.

You are welcome to comment about the discussion for deletion. Ikip 19:03, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Idont Havaname! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 4 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Mark Mulder - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 00:00, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Amusement Park WikiProject

Hello Idont Havaname. Recently, the Amusement Parks WikiProject was reformatted and revived. As part of this process other related WikiProjects (such as Disneyland, Herschend Family Entertainment, Universal Parks & Resorts and Walt Disney World) were also revived and have now become part of the Amusement Park WikiProject as task forces. If you would like to remain listed as a member on these WikiProjects please re-add your name to the appropriate lists at the participants page. All names currently on the list have been cleared. If you have any queries, please do not hesitate to contact me directly. Thank you for your cooperation, Themeparkgc Talk 08:21, 6 November 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Hello, Idont Havaname. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

URGENT DELETION MESSAGE

DEAR ADMINISTRATOR,

I request that my account be deleted with immediate effect, and that all my edits in the past, and past edit histories, be permanently removed from public viewing. Deletion of my account, City of Lukington, would be immensely appreciated.

I hope that this reaches you soon and that you are able to act upon my request.

Yours sincerely, Unknown user (formerly City of Lukington) — Preceding unsigned comment added by City of Lukington (talk • contribs) 20:37, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Request for comment

Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by Anna Frodesiak. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:47, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Transracial for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Transracial is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transracial (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tadeusz Nowak (talk) 20:44, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Deadlines for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Deadlines is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Deadlines until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Feedback 00:51, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:30, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:30, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]