Talk:Altered Images

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Low-importance).

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

after which McElhone formed Texas, a group which would have intermittent UK success but is largely unknown in the U.S.

That's a bit US-centric, isn't it? Would it be more accurate to say 'intermittent UK success bit is largely unknown outside Britain'? sheridan 20:59, 2004 Dec 21 (UTC)

You realise the band is called Texas? 80.4.202.8 (talk) 02:05, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Texas are Scottish and named after the film Paris, Texas. 92.0.42.40 (talk) 15:19, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

YouTube links

This article is one of thousands on Wikipedia that have a link to YouTube in it. Based on the External links policy, most of these should probably be removed. I'm putting this message here, on this talk page, to request the regular editors take a look at the link and make sure it doesn't violate policy. In short: 1. 99% of the time YouTube should not be used as a source. 2. We must not link to material that violates someones copyright. If you are not sure if the link on this article should be removed, feel free to ask me on my talk page and I'll review it personally. Thanks. ---J.S (t|c) 04:29, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes On Merging

I think my article and the main "Altered Images" article being merged, which already appears to have happened, is a good idea. A deletion of my existing article would be fine with me. It works better as a part of the "Altered Images" article, as the article on just the song is too short. --Putnam269 (talk) 00:49, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge please. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.7.186.232 (talk) 14:32, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

agreed, someone please merge! Feudonym (talk) 12:09, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose if someone were to expand the song properly, which was a fairly successfully charted single, both the song and the band articles would be big enough to survive on their own. My 80s pop knowledge is sadly not backed up by Reliable Sources on my bookshelf though. Casliber (talk · contribs) 21:11, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yes please merge. the song article is not only short, it's so small as to practically not exist. What's the reason to think that there are sources out there that make it notable enough for its own article? MartinPoulter (talk) 16:51, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Altered Images. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:55, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dead Pop Stars

I am going to edit the sentence which includes "but badly timed in its release the day of John Lennon's death" which claims 'Dead Pop Stars' was released on the day Lennon died but he in fact died in December 1980 and the song, according to Discogs, was actually released on 27 Feb 1981. With reference to the Guinness Book of Hit Singles, the song first charted in the UK on 28 Mar 1981 which ties in with the Discogs release date. If anyone can find a more concrete reference proving it was initially released on the day Lennon died then please revert this edit. Solatha (talk) 15:54, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Straight away Discogs is not a reliable source. Clare Grogan suggests that "[it got pulled on the day it was released because that was the day John Lennon died]"; possibly 27 February was when it was rereleased, but you'll want a better source.--Laun chba ller 16:12, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]