Jump to content

Talk:Indigo children

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Aceandretti.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 00:27, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Indigo children. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:47, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, BVLSingler here :) I'm entirely new to wikipedia so I thought I would drop a suggestion of a link to my book on the Indigo Children that came out in 2017 and someone can decide if it is appropriate to add into the wiki page or not :) link is: https://www.routledge.com/The-Indigo-Children-New-Age-Experimentation-with-Self-and-Science-1st/Singler/p/book/9781472489630

B — Preceding unsigned comment added by BVLSingler (talk • contribs) 14:16, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"pseudoscientific"

[edit]

Pseudoscientific isn't just another word for wrong. Pseudoscientific implies the claim purports to be scientific in the first place. No doubt many New Agers make pseudoscientific claims, but the subject is not intrinsically "pseudoscientific" any more than any religion or unfalsifiable intellectual endeavour is. Maskettaman (talk) 08:57, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Maskettaman:
Re Pseudoscientific implies the claim purports to be scientific in the first place -- this includes scientifically testable claims that pretend to be magic instead.
Re any more than any religion or unfalsifiable intellectual endeavour is -- There's a difference between "this is outside the boundaries of science" and "this is something scientifically testable but please don't." "Is there an Absolute or Ground-of-Being" would fall under the former, "I believe my baby will glow purple in Kirlian photography (even if I've not actually checked), so therefore anyone who says he has less than a 200 IQ and lacks telepathy is just testing him wrong" falls well into the later. Ian.thomson (talk) 15:24, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Science is just a school of thought based on(mostly) 3rd dimensional reality. Since you have not achieved Satori, you will never, ever, ever, understand anything. I have more content to add to this page, but it's all original research, because I am the one researching this in the western world. I am Metteyya. Jsderwin (talk) 10:19, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Jsderwin: Wikipedia does not use original research and talk pages are not general discussion forums. Take your pseudo-Buddhism elsewhere. Ian.thomson (talk) 13:18, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Ian, it's concerning when a person with your attitude, and editing power, thinks he knows everything. You are prideful. Good for you. Enjoy your role in the game. Cheers. Jsderwin (talk) 22:21, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Jsderwin: I never claimed to know everything. You, however, decided you know what my spiritual state is from a single post -- that's pride, haughty hypocrite. Ian.thomson (talk) 22:43, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ian and the others 4 the record, " Take your pseudo-Buddhism elsewhere." Ian, if you don't know that that is rude, then I apologize. Otherwise, I rest my case. Jsderwin (talk) 12:50, 15 September 2018 (UTC) and 4 the record I AM METTEYYA — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jsderwin (talk • contribs) 12:52, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Jsderwin: Dude, you're pretty much shouting that you're the Buddhist messiah, after deciding that someone you don't know will never understand anything. That's beyond pride, that's the sort of arrogance that Buddhism warns against and it misses the point of the great vehicle entirely. Ian.thomson (talk) 17:19, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You should ask a Buddhist, or Hindu sometime, instead of reading it online... So I am going to help you by sending some real life Gods here, to help me explain to you, the western mind, what the rest of the world already knows. We are all God. Jsderwin (talk) 18:25, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

you are so filled with sin, you cannot see your own arrogance. iI have already met the western God, my God, me of the blood of the missing tribe. I have complete access to the Ahkasic records. I am the Librarian, and the Programmer. You, my son, live the THE MATRIX. Here is some basic information to help you begin to understand that you are nothing more than an idea. I am the Sly Man. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5vq0l1Jx9MY Jsderwin (talk) 18:29, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Jsderwin: Are you here to build an encyclopedia according to this community's standards or are you here to preach about how great you think you are? Your past several contributions suggest the latter. Ian.thomson (talk) 18:30, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

cool man. adios, padre. Jsderwin (talk) 18:44, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Er, do you have any suggestions for how we mere mortals may improve this article, oh Great One? - LuckyLouie (talk)
His tantrums aside, satori is not an elitist experience. Many people have experienced it and will experience it, and no, they do not become world teachers or get magic powers just because they had an experience of religious ecstasy. Tgeorgescu (talk) 11:04, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Exactly, this is religious, not psuedoscientific. If you're going to call it psuedoscientific be even-handed and apply the same term to every prophecy found in any religion. Call the belief in the resurrection of Jesus psuedoscientific. Otherwise you're not critically examining religion however you fancy yourself, you're just elevating Christianity and other favored Western religions over minority religions. 38.49.79.101 (talk) 02:27, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

3RR exemption

[edit]

Reverting vandalism is 3RR exemption. Tgeorgescu (talk) 10:51, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Facts about indigo children!!

[edit]

Indigo children have an indigo/blue aura hints the name indigo children. They noticed the aura started to be indigo in the 60s with certain children. This started the whole want to research the "indigo aura" and found these similar traits in the children. 75.71.144.108 (talk) 15:44, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Missing from this: Sources about those facts!!
We won't just add your opinions to the article because you say they are facts. See WP:OR and WP:RS. --Hob Gadling (talk) 17:54, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
In fact, the stuff about auras is already mentioned in the article. --Florian Blaschke (talk) 12:36, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Indigo_children&oldid=1266095039"